User talk:Damon

The UESPWiki – Your source for The Elder Scrolls since 1995
Jump to: navigation, search
Current Status: After a somewhat lengthy break, I'm back to participate in the community a bit more and try to focus on some pet projects I've been meaning to do. -damon  talkcontribs
Archive 1: All 2011 posts
Archive 2: All 2012 posts
Archive 3: All 2013 posts
Archive 4: All 2014 posts
Archive 5: All 2015 posts
Jo'Sakhar: Jo'Sakhar's talk page
Cookies: Stale food pile
Warnings: Ugly red banner pile (empty)

Servers apart[edit]

Sorry Damon, you are absolutely right that we are on the different servers (not sure why I thought you were on European server?). I proposed adding you to friendlist because of the " I wasn't certain how to contact her" etc. So I thought maybe ESO friendlist would work - but it doesn't really matter now haha. Sorry for derailing the nomination thread :) Regarding the UESP guild: the European guild is rather small and many of us probably often play solo. UESP NA branch might well be similar, in which case you might enjoy being part of the guild. These are just my thoughts :p Tib (talk) 10:14, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Well, in addition to preferring going solo, Tib, while I wouldn't mind playing ESO with some of the people I see listed as officers for the Euro's guild, the same can't be said for the NA guild officers, at least who are listed on the page. They are nice enough people to politely chat with on the wiki or forum or IRC if I must do so, but I don't like them enough to game with them. Because I don't care for online games with other people, I am extraordinarily particular about who I'd tolerate playing with, you know? :p -damon  talkcontribs 19:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


Hey Damon, send me an email containing your email address used for Tumblr. For some reason, that's the only way for me to add people to the Tumblr. --AKB Talk Cont Mail 02:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Alright, will do. -damon  talkcontribs 03:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


I see that you just reverted my edit on Morrowind:Death_of_a_Taxman. Without getting into the specifics of this edit, my understanding if wiki etiquette is that, if you disagree with an edit, you discuss it with the contributor before reverting it. That way you avoid edit wars. Is this wiki different? Tungsic (talk) 04:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

The recommended cycle normally is bold, revert, discuss. You boldly made changes, Damon reverted them, so now, if you object to the reversion, you discuss. From the looks of it, though, someone has restored the relevant information without mentioning the mod, which is obviously what Damon was objecting to, so I'd guess there's no need for discussion, but that's for the two of you to figure out. :) Robin Hood  (talk) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Help Wanted[edit]

So... I saw this script on the internet and was curious if it would work, and rather than set the date for something short, I stupidly set it for 100 years, 2 months, and change. I can report back that the script works, however I stupidly didn't think it through and now all of my login attempts are met with a scripted force logout.

Sometime in the next couple of days I'm going to need an administrator to revert the most recent edit to User:Damon/common.js, ideally sometime within the next 50 years, because being back here - or even alive - when I'm 125 seems... No so likely. No rush, though it's not like I have any important projects to get to so I can wait somewhat patiently considering it was entirely my own idiocy that got me in this predicament. ~Damon

Done. Good job! Robin Hood  (talk) 07:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)