Oblivion talk:Glenroy

The UESPWiki – Your source for The Elder Scrolls since 1995
Jump to: navigation, search

Glenroy's death[edit]

Glenroy's death is scripted he can die without taking any damage, even crumble to the ground right beside the emporer, should there be a note about his scripted death? Mikeyboy52 00:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

There's already a "note" (sort of) in the infobox on the right, where it says "essential" you can see in parentheses that it says Scripted Death. --S'drassa T2M 00:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Glenroy Lives!!![edit]

I was playing the game again and at the end of the battle when glenroy is supposed to "die" he was still alive and still marked as an Essential. Is this a glitch or has something interfered with his script? BTW, I'm on the 360. 82.7.83.64 18:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Must be a glitch (which is the same thing as something messing up his script). He's supposed to become killable the minute the fight starts, and even if he isn't killed during the battle he drops dead when the emperor dies. I doubt it will have much effect on the game though, as you'll never visit that same Sanctum again. Legoless 18:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Take it for gold[edit]

I edited the part where it said Baurus will only take the sword if you have gold Wolfi 19:53, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

You misinterpreted that. It meant he has some gold in his inventory. But the sentence was very unclear anyway ~ Dwarfmp 19:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
I apologise if the sentence seemed very ambiguous. mxk101Talk 20:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
I can see how it could be misinterpreted. It's like one of those "When I nod my head, you hit it" jokes. I certainly hadn't spotted the problem until Wolfi pointed it out. Don't be discouraged, Mxk! rpeh •TCE 20:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

talking to him a bit...[edit]

and "the emperor may trust you but I don't" became "maybe the emperor is right about you, the best way to help is let us do our jobs" at some point. not sure if it was because I killed the majority of the assassins or what but thought it was worth pointing out in the talk section— Unsigned comment by 24.38.217.116 (talk) at 18:57 on 01 June 2014