Lore talk:Warlock's Ring

Anora's Journal

With the removal of any mention of Warlock's ring in the journal, I don't think it should be mentioned in the main text anymore and should be moved to a notes section instead. It's essentially cut content now. --Ilaro (talk) 00:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Agreed Bethesda most likely didn't want it there for a reason so it should be moved to notes but be much shorter --ImperialBattlespire 21:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

I agree with moving it to the notes section. Zebendal (talk) 20:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Provided the current paragraph is maintained, I'm fine with it as a note. Shame they cut that lore. —Legoless (talk) 20:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Previous Owners

I recently undid the unexplained deletion of this section from the page. It was subsequently deleted again with the argument that "Anonymous wizard, Anonymous mage" is filler content and can be observed from the remaining text on the page.

While I agree that these lists repeat information already contained in the main body of prose, they are a feature on many artifact pages and provide a summary of historic wielders. To me this seems like useful information to preserve on this page and others (Lore:Mehrunes' Razor comes to mind). The anonymous Daggerfall-era owners may not be particularly notable in their own right, but this is a feature of that game's randomised quests. The remaining four people listed are not "filler" and are fully named. Furthermore, I don't think a 500-word article can be considered "very small". —⁠Legoless (talk) 11:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)